Fixing High CPU Usage In Test-app 8001: A Deep Dive

by Viktoria Ivanova 52 views

Hey everyone! Today, we're diving deep into a fascinating case of high CPU usage we encountered with our test-app pod, specifically instance 8001. We'll break down the problem, explore the root cause, and walk through the solution. Let's get started!

Understanding the Problem: High CPU Usage Leading to Restarts

We observed that our test-app:8001 pod in the default namespace was experiencing unexpectedly high CPU utilization. This wasn't just a minor spike; it was a sustained surge that led to frequent restarts. Analyzing the logs, we initially saw normal application behavior. However, the persistent CPU overload hinted at a deeper issue within the application's code. High CPU usage can be a real headache, guys, as it can lead to performance degradation, application instability, and even service outages. Identifying the root cause is crucial to ensure the smooth operation of our applications. When troubleshooting such issues, it's essential to have a systematic approach. First, we gather as much information as possible, including pod logs, resource metrics, and application behavior. Then, we analyze the data to pinpoint the potential sources of the problem. In this case, the frequent pod restarts served as a clear indicator that something was seriously amiss. We needed to dig deeper to understand what was driving the CPU usage through the roof. So, let's move on to the nitty-gritty details of our analysis.

Root Cause Analysis: The Unoptimized cpu_intensive_task() Function

After careful investigation, we pinpointed the culprit: the cpu_intensive_task() function. This function, designed to simulate a computationally demanding task, was running an unoptimized brute-force shortest path algorithm. The algorithm was operating on large graphs without any rate limiting or timeout controls. What does this mean in plain English? Well, imagine you're trying to find the shortest route between two cities on a map. A brute-force approach would involve checking every possible route, which can be incredibly time-consuming, especially with a large map. Similarly, our cpu_intensive_task() was exhaustively searching for the shortest path in a complex graph, consuming significant CPU resources in the process. The problem was compounded by the fact that the function was running continuously in multiple threads – twice the number of CPU cores, to be exact! This meant that the system was constantly bombarded with computationally intensive tasks, pushing the CPU to its absolute limit. Moreover, the lack of any throttling mechanism meant that the function would relentlessly churn away, even if it was taking an unreasonably long time to find a solution. This runaway CPU consumption was the primary driver behind the pod's high CPU usage and subsequent restarts. To summarize, the root cause was a combination of an unoptimized algorithm, lack of rate limiting, and excessive threading. Identifying these factors was the first step towards devising a solution.

The Proposed Fix: Optimizing the CPU-Intensive Task

To tackle this issue head-on, we came up with a multi-pronged approach to optimize the cpu_intensive_task() function. Our fix involves the following key changes:

  1. Reducing the Graph Size: We've scaled down the graph size from 20 nodes to a more manageable 10 nodes. This significantly reduces the search space for the shortest path algorithm, cutting down on computational complexity. Think of it as simplifying the map from a large metropolitan area to a smaller town. Finding the shortest route in a smaller graph is naturally much faster.
  2. Adding Rate Limiting: We've introduced a 0.5-second sleep between iterations. This acts as a rate limiter, preventing the function from hogging the CPU and allowing other processes to execute. It's like giving the CPU a breather between each calculation, preventing it from overheating.
  3. Implementing a Timeout: We've set a 5-second timeout per iteration. If an iteration takes longer than 5 seconds, it's automatically terminated. This prevents the function from getting stuck in long-running calculations and further exacerbating CPU usage. It's like saying,